东京爱情故事

‘Hong Kong Alliance’ found guilty of inciting subversion; verdict clarifies boundaries between free speech and national security_我的网站

一 | 据新浪财经1月11日新闻报道，10月10日晚，由中国企业家俱乐部主办的“商业春节晚会：2019年道农会”隆重举行。    

    West Kowloon Law Courts Building in Hong Kong Photo: VCG
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported. 
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong. 
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported. 
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted. 
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said. 
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday. 
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued. 
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said. 
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday. 
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said. 
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday. 
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said. 
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added. 
。

二 | 中国企业俱乐部的董事会成员马云、刘传志、曹国伟、王忠军、刘永浩等都表现出了巨大的才华。刘传志和余谦交谈，马云唱了一首歌《空城计》。其中，刘传志在相声中与余谦交谈，刘传志是一个调笑者，余谦是一个恭维者。

三 | 刘传志嘲笑马云说：“（马云）有一站，玉树林峰啊，一笑，大家的风度。你看得越多，你就越喜欢它。关键不是我喜欢它。你看得越多，你就越喜欢它。马云是中国妇女的敌人。除了刘传志的相声之外，中国企业家俱乐部主席马云还展示了他的家政技巧。他出生在一个民间艺术家庭，表演京剧《空城计划》，以超强的生命力结束。据了解，中化集团董事长宁高宁、亚信集团董事长田顺宁、民生银行董事长红旗、友友网前董事长李东生、友海昌车间董事长王文静、智前董事长毛大庆等，除马云、刘传志上台演出外，还有友友网前董事长田顺宁、友海昌车间董事长王文静。

四 | 招商银行、华谊兄弟、新浪董事长王忠军。曹国伟董事长、新物流董事会执行主席沈国军、黑土集团创始人孙强、中国企业家俱乐部创始人总经理程宏、正合岛创始人刘东华、新奥集团董事长王玉锁、新希望集团董事长刘永浩、清华控股有限公司专职董事徐景宏，复兴集团董事长郭广昌、高晓松等，戴玉强、郎朗、陆思清、于谦等同台演出。

Current article:http://6ayu2i.cuntoujuefourantapai.cfd/s0pr/20260826/903284.html

Published on:05:21:59